Is 4:3 making a comeback? The retro monitor ratio and why some developers still prefer it

4:3 is the classic CRT monitor and early LCD aspect ratio. It's nearly square (1.33:1), which makes it terrible for widescreen video but excellent for reading documents, writing code, and viewing portrait-orientation content. It's the aspect ratio of the iPad and a small but passionate niche of portable monitors and e-ink displays.

Aspect ratio
4:3
15" diagonal
Dimensions
30.5 cm × 22.9 cm
15" at 4:3
Category
Specialty Ratios
Aspect ratio guide

Calculator

Back to Home

Aspect Ratio Visualizer

Compare field-of-view (FOV) and physical screen real estate between standard monitors, ultrawides, and mobile screens.

Screen A

Screen B

Screen A: 16:9
Screen B: 21:9
Difference: 21:9 is 31.3% wider than 16:9

How this is calculated

The 4:3 format refuses to die because a square-ish screen is genuinely useful for specific workflows. A 4:3 monitor in portrait mode (3:4) is essentially a full-page document viewer that shows an entire A4/Letter page at once without scrolling. Developers who work with long log files or vertical terminal output sometimes prefer a 4:3 secondary monitor. The modern revival is driven by portable USB-C monitors in the 10-15 inch range that mimic the iPad's shape.

Verdict

4:3 is a niche productivity format, not a general recommendation. It's worth considering as a secondary monitor in portrait mode for reading documentation, monitoring logs, or displaying dashboards. For a primary monitor, 16:9 or 16:10 is more practical for the content most people consume.

Frequently asked questions

Can you still buy 4:3 monitors?
New 4:3 monitors are rare and mostly limited to specialty industrial or medical displays. The modern alternative is a 16:10 or 3:2 monitor rotated to portrait mode, which gives a similar experience for document viewing.