RAID 0 with two 2 TB drives: speed, capacity, and the zero-redundancy gamble

RAID 0 with two 2 TB drives stripes data across both disks, giving you 4 TB of usable capacity and roughly double the sequential read and write speeds of a single drive. It's the fastest RAID level and the most dangerous: there is zero redundancy. If either drive fails, all data on both drives is gone.

RAID level
RAID 0
2 × 2000 GB drives
Usable capacity
4.0 TB
4.0 TB raw
Fault tolerance
None
Zero redundancy

Calculator

Back to Home

RAID Calculator

Calculate usable capacity, fault tolerance, and read/write scaling for different RAID levels.

Configuration

Usable Capacity
12 TB
Total Capacity
16 TB

Storage Efficiency

75%
🛡️
Fault Tolerance:

Survives 1 drive failure

How this is calculated

RAID 0 multiplies failure risk. A single drive might have a 2% annual failure rate. Two drives in RAID 0 have a combined ~4% annual chance of array loss, assuming independent failures. In practice, drives bought at the same time from the same batch tend to fail around the same time, making the real-world risk slightly higher. The speed benefit is real for sequential workloads like video editing scratch disks and large file transfers. For random I/O (boot drives, game libraries), the real-world speedup is much smaller, typically 20-40% rather than the theoretical 2×.

Verdict

RAID 0 makes sense for a video editing scratch disk or a Steam library where the data is easily re-downloadable and speed matters more than safety. Never use it for anything you can't afford to lose. A single fast NVMe SSD will outperform a RAID 0 array of older drives for most workloads anyway.

More Performance scenarios

Frequently asked questions

Is RAID 0 faster than a single NVMe SSD?
Two SATA SSDs in RAID 0 can approach or match a single mid-range NVMe SSD in sequential speed (~1,000 MB/s), but a single modern NVMe drive (5,000-7,000 MB/s) will crush any SATA RAID 0 array.