TechCompare LogoTechCompare

RAID 0 vs RAID 1: speed and space, or a safety net?

Choose RAID 0 only for replaceable data where speed and capacity matter and loss is an inconvenience, not a disaster. Choose RAID 1 for data you can't afford downtime on — a single mirrored pair is the simplest way to keep working through a drive failure. For most people storing anything important, RAID 1 (or a parity array) is the right default.

The most opposite pair in storage: all performance versus all protection.

RAID 0 and RAID 1 are the two simplest arrays, and they sit at opposite ends of the trade-off. RAID 0 stripes data across both drives for double the capacity and roughly double the throughput, but a single drive failure destroys the entire array. RAID 1 mirrors the same data onto both drives, so you keep only one drive's worth of space but survive a complete drive failure with zero data loss.

By TechCompare · Updated

Try this comparison with our tools

Same 2 × 4 TB drives, each scheme

Two 4 TB drives under each scheme. RAID 0 doubles your space and speed but tolerates zero failures; RAID 1 halves your space to keep a full mirror that survives a drive dying. Neither replaces a real backup.

RAID 0

Usable capacity

8 TB

of 8 TB raw

Storage efficiency — 100%

Fault tolerance

None — any drive failure loses the array

RAID 1

Usable capacity

4 TB

of 8 TB raw

Storage efficiency — 50%

Fault tolerance

Survives 1 of 2 drives failing

Capacity and fault tolerance only — rebuild risk and write performance also depend on drive size and controller.

Same 2 × 4 TB bay pre-loaded for both levels. Change the bay size or the drives, or add a third level.
Edit in the full tool
Option A
RAID 0
Wins 3 of 10 compared specs
Option B
RAID 1
Wins 3 of 10 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecRAID 0RAID 1
Minimum drives22
Usable capacity (2 × 4 TB)8 TB (better on this spec)4 TB
Storage efficiency100% (better on this spec)50%
Drives tolerated lost01 (better on this spec)
Read performance~2× single driveUp to ~2× (either disk)
Write performance~2× single drive (better on this spec)~1× single drive
Rebuild on failureImpossible (data lost)Copy from mirror (better on this spec)
Risk profileDoubles failure riskHalves downtime risk (better on this spec)
Replaces a backup?NoNo
Typical useScratch / cache / gamesBoot mirror / small NAS

How they differ

With two 4 TB drives, RAID 0 gives you 8 TB usable and near-double sequential read/write, which is why it's used for scratch disks, video editing caches, and game libraries where the data is replaceable. RAID 1 gives you 4 TB usable and reads can be served from either disk (a read speedup), but writes happen to both so write speed is unchanged. The critical point both share: RAID is not backup. RAID 0 has zero redundancy, and even RAID 1 won't protect you from accidental deletion, ransomware, or a controller failure that corrupts both mirrors. A 3-2-1 backup is still mandatory either way.

Verdict

With two 4 TB drives, RAID 0 gives you 8 TB usable at near-double sequential read and write speed, which is exactly why it suits scratch disks, edit caches, and game libraries. RAID 1 halves that to 4 TB but reads can be served from either disk (a small read speedup) and a complete drive failure costs you zero data. The killer detail neither side escapes: RAID is not a backup. RAID 0 has zero redundancy, and RAID 1 won't save you from deletion, ransomware, or a controller fault that corrupts both mirrors, so a 3-2-1 backup is mandatory under either.

Size a RAID 0 or RAID 1 array

Which should you pick?

Choose RAID 0

Pick RAID 0 for scratch drives, editing caches, OS-level temp space, or game installs — anything you can re-download or regenerate. Never put irreplaceable files on RAID 0.

Size a RAID 0 stripe

Choose RAID 1

Pick RAID 1 for a small always-on server, a home NAS holding documents and photos, or a workstation boot mirror where surviving a drive failure without downtime is worth giving up half the raw capacity.

Size a RAID 1 mirror

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Does RAID 0 actually double your drive performance?
Sequential reads and writes roughly double because data is striped across both drives. Two 4 TB drives yield 8 TB usable at near-2x single-drive throughput. This is why RAID 0 is used for scratch disks, video editing caches, and game libraries. But any single drive failure destroys the entire array with zero recovery possibility.
Is RAID 1 a substitute for a backup?
No. RAID 1 mirrors data so you survive a single drive failure with zero downtime, but it doesn't protect against accidental deletion, ransomware, or controller failure that corrupts both mirrors. A 3-2-1 backup (3 copies, 2 different media, 1 offsite) is still mandatory. RAID is uptime insurance, not backup insurance.
When does RAID 1 win over RAID 0?
When you can't afford downtime on the data. A small always-on server, a home NAS holding documents and photos, or a workstation boot mirror. RAID 1 gives up half the raw capacity (4 TB usable from 2x4 TB) but survives a complete drive failure with zero data loss. RAID 0 should never hold irreplaceable files.