TechCompare LogoTechCompare

DDR4 vs DDR5: which memory generation is right for your build?

DDR5 is the right answer for any new build in 2026, as all current-gen platforms use it, kit prices are competitive, and the bandwidth advantage is real for productivity workloads. DDR4 is only the right choice if you're upgrading an existing DDR4 AM4 / LGA1200 / LGA1700 system where replacing the motherboard doesn't make sense.

The memory generation change that's now mainstream, with real caveats.

DDR5 doubles DDR4's per-channel bandwidth (two 32-bit sub-channels per DIMM vs a single 64-bit channel) and more than doubles typical per-module capacity. It's the memory standard every new Intel and AMD platform uses in 2026. But raw latency hasn't improved proportionally: a DDR5-6000 CL30 kit has the same 10 ns first-word latency as DDR4-3200 CL16, and tight-tuned DDR4-3600 CL16 is actually faster in absolute terms.

By TechCompare · Updated

Try this comparison with our tools

True latency, converted to nanoseconds

The DDR5 sweet-spot kit (DDR5-6000 CL30) versus the DDR4 mainstream baseline (DDR4-3200 CL16). Note the punchline: despite nearly double the data rate, first-word latency is essentially identical — DDR5's win is bandwidth, not latency.

DDR4-3200 CL16

First-word latency

10.00 ns

Peak bandwidth / channel

25.6 GB/s

DDR5-6000 CL30

First-word latency

10.00 ns

Peak bandwidth / channel

48.0 GB/s

Latency = CAS (CL) × clock-cycle time. Higher MT/s shortens the cycle, looser CL lengthens the cycle count — the nanosecond figure is what actually reaches the CPU.

Both kits pre-loaded, DDR4-3200 CL16 vs DDR5-6000 CL30. Tune the timings to match your exact DIMMs.
Edit in the full tool
Option A
DDR4
Wins 2 of 12 compared specs
Option B
DDR5
Wins 10 of 12 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecDDR4DDR5
Typical mainstream speed3200-3600 MT/s5600-6400 MT/s (better on this spec)
Peak per-channel bandwidth25.6 GB/s48 GB/s (better on this spec)
Best first-word latency~8.9 ns (3600 CL16) (better on this spec)~10 ns (6000 CL30)
Voltage (nominal)1.2 V1.1 V (better on this spec)
On-DIMM voltage regulationMotherboardPMIC per module (better on this spec)
Max per-module capacity32 GB64 GB (128 GB emerging) (better on this spec)
Channels per DIMM1 × 64-bit2 × 32-bit sub-channels (better on this spec)
Error correction (consumer)NoneOn-die ECC (better on this spec)
Platform support (2026)Legacy AM4 / LGA1200/1700All current platforms (better on this spec)
Relative kit priceLower (better on this spec)Slightly higher
Good for gamingStill competitiveDefault choice (better on this spec)
Good for productivity / VMsAdequateMeaningfully better (better on this spec)

How they differ

DDR5's advantage is bandwidth and capacity, not latency. A DDR5-6000 kit delivers 48 GB/s per channel vs DDR4-3200's 25.6 GB/s, meaningful for memory bandwidth bound workloads like large-scale compilation, video encoding, and running virtual machines. Max per-DIMM capacity doubles (64 GB DDR5 modules ship, DDR4 taps out around 32 GB). On the negative side, DDR5 runs at 1.1 V nominal vs DDR4's 1.2 V (similar idle power, slightly higher under load due to on-module voltage regulation), and early adoption meant higher kit prices, which are now mostly normalized by 2026. Platform compatibility is the forced choice factor: Intel 12th-gen and older Ryzen 5000 use DDR4, Intel Core 15th-gen (LGA1851) and Ryzen 7000/9000 boards require DDR5, and 13th and 14th-gen Intel boards come in both DDR4 and DDR5 variants.

Verdict

On bandwidth, DDR5-6000 delivers 48 GB/s per channel versus DDR4-3200's 25.6 GB/s, a meaningful gap for memory-bound workloads like large compilation, video encoding, and VMs. The trade is latency: a DDR4-3600 CL16 kit hits about 8.9 ns first-word latency, while a DDR5-6000 CL30 kit lands around 10 ns, so tuned DDR4 is actually faster in absolute latency. DDR5 also doubles per-DIMM capacity (64 GB modules shipping, DDR4 taps out around 32 GB), adds on-die ECC, and moves voltage regulation onto the module. The platform lock wins: AM5 / LGA1700-current boards are DDR5-only.

See DDR5-6000 CL30 latency

Which should you pick?

Choose DDR4

Pick DDR4 only for DDR4-based platform upgrades (Ryzen 5000 on AM4, Core 10th-12th gen on LGA1200/1700), or for ultra-budget builds where a used DDR4 kit is genuinely cheaper.

Compare DDR4-3600 CL16 latency

Choose DDR5

Pick DDR5 for any new platform purchase. Intel Core 15th-gen (LGA1851) and Ryzen 7000/9000 boards require DDR5, while 13th and 14th-gen Intel boards come in both DDR4 and DDR5 variants, and the bandwidth advantage directly translates to performance in memory-heavy workloads.

See DDR5-6000 CL30 latency

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Does DDR5 have lower latency than DDR4?
Not in first-word latency. A DDR5-6000 CL30 kit has the same 10 ns first-word latency as DDR4-3200 CL16. Tight-tuned DDR4-3600 CL16 is actually faster at 8.9 ns. DDR5's win is bandwidth (48 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s per channel) and capacity (64 GB modules vs 32 GB max), not latency.
Do I have a choice between DDR4 and DDR5 on a new build?
It depends on the platform. Intel Core 15th-gen (LGA1851) and Ryzen 7000/9000 boards require DDR5, while 13th and 14th-gen Intel boards come in both DDR4 and DDR5 variants. DDR4 is only the right choice if you're upgrading an existing DDR4 system (Ryzen 5000 on AM4, Core 10th-12th gen on LGA1200/1700, or a DDR4 LGA1700 board) where replacing the motherboard doesn't make sense.
Is DDR5 worth the price premium over DDR4?
Yes for any new build. Kit prices have largely normalized by 2026, and the 2x bandwidth advantage is real for memory-bandwidth-bound workloads like compilation, video encoding, and running VMs. The bandwidth advantage directly translates to performance in memory-heavy workloads. The on-die ECC is also a nice bonus.