TechCompare LogoTechCompare

Token efficiency: how to say more with fewer tokens and cut your LLM bill

Token efficiency compounds. Saving 50 tokens per request across 10,000 daily requests saves 500,000 tokens per day, which is real money at scale. Write for the model the way you'd write for a busy colleague: clear, direct, no fluff.

Token efficiency is about maximizing the intelligence you get per token you spend. Wasted tokens are wasted money. A verbose system prompt with 500 tokens of polite filler costs the same as 500 tokens of detailed instructions, and the latter gets better results. The most common token wastes: redundant instructions repeated across messages, politeness padding, examples that are longer than necessary, and including entire documents when only a section is relevant.

By TechCompare · Updated

Knowledge area
Best Practices
Practical token optimization advice
Topic focus
Token efficiency
token-efficiency

How this is calculated

Concrete efficiency tactics: use imperative mood ('Return a JSON array of...') instead of polite requests ('Could you please return...'), which saves 5-10 tokens per prompt with no quality loss. Put static instructions in the system prompt where they can be cached. Use the shortest example that demonstrates the pattern. For structured output, use the API's native structured output or JSON mode instead of describing the format in the prompt. Trim trailing whitespace, which some tokenizers count as tokens. For multi-turn conversations, prune the history aggressively: models rarely need more than the last 5-10 exchanges for context.

Verdict

The savings stack because every wasted token is wasted spend. Imperative phrasing like 'Return a JSON array of...' beats 'Could you please return...' by 5-10 tokens per prompt with no quality hit, and trimming trailing whitespace matters because some tokenizers count it. Static instructions belong in the cacheable system prompt, and multi-turn chats rarely need more than the last 5-10 exchanges. Native structured output beats describing the format in prose.

More Tokens scenarios

What are tokens
A token is the atomic unit of text that a language model processes.
View details ➜
OpenAI vs Llama tokenizer
A sentence that costs 50 tokens on GPT-5 might cost 55 tokens on Llama 4 or 48 on Claude.
View details ➜
Token limits by model
Context window size is the maximum number of tokens a model can process in a single request, including both input and output.
View details ➜

Frequently asked questions

Does saying 'please' to an LLM waste tokens?
A little, and it adds up. Politeness padding like 'please' and 'could you please return' costs 5-10 tokens per prompt with zero effect on output quality. Imperative phrasing ('Return a JSON array of...') is shorter and equally clear. At 10,000 daily requests, dropping 50 tokens from each saves half a million tokens a day.
Does whitespace and formatting affect token counts?
Yes, at the margins. Trailing spaces, extra newlines, and decorative indentation all count as tokens on most tokenizers. Pretty-printed JSON sent as a prompt costs noticeably more than its minified form. Clean the input programmatically before sending, since the model doesn't need your formatting to parse the content.
How much conversation history should I keep in the context?
Usually the last 5-10 exchanges. Older turns rarely change the next answer, and every retained message re-bills on every request. For conversations that genuinely need old context, summarize the earlier part into a compact note and carry that instead of the raw transcript. The summary costs a fraction of the tokens.