Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4: flagship reasoning or workhorse value?

Anthropic's premium reasoning flagship against OpenAI's cost-effective workhorse.

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's latest flagship, built for deep reasoning, complex planning, and nuanced analysis. GPT-5.4 is OpenAI's workhorse model, balancing cost and capability for everyday production workloads. Opus 4.8 costs roughly 2x more per token. The question is whether your task genuinely needs Opus-level reasoning depth.

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.

Claude Haiku 4.5
$8.00
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$13.88
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k)
$17.00
GPT-5.4
$21.25
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$24.00
Claude Opus 4.8
$40.00
GPT-5.5
$42.50
Option A
Claude Opus 4.8
Wins 0 of 4 compared specs
Option B
GPT-5.4
Wins 3 of 4 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.4
Input Cost (per M)$5.00$2.50 (better on this spec)
Output Cost (per M)$25.00$15.00 (better on this spec)
Cached Input (per M)$0.50$0.25 (better on this spec)
Batch Discount50%50%

How they differ

Claude Opus 4.8: $5/M input, $25/M output, 90% caching discount ($0.50/M cached), 50% batch discount. GPT-5.4: $2.50/M input, $15/M output, 90% caching discount ($0.25/M cached), 50% batch discount. For a typical 100K input + 10K output request, Opus 4.8 costs $0.75, GPT-5.4 costs $0.40. Over a million requests, that's $750K vs $400K — a $350K difference. Opus 4.8 leads on graduate-level reasoning, mathematical proofs, and multi-step agentic tasks. GPT-5.4 is competitive or better on general knowledge, coding, and instruction following at half the price.

Verdict

GPT-5.4 for most production workloads: it's cheaper and more than capable enough for RAG, chat, coding, and content generation. Claude Opus 4.8 for tasks where reasoning depth directly impacts business outcomes: legal analysis, scientific research, complex financial modeling, and multi-step autonomous agents where a wrong answer costs more than the API savings.

Which should you pick?

Choose Claude Opus 4.8

Tasks where reasoning depth directly impacts business outcomes: legal analysis, scientific research, complex financial modeling, and multi-step autonomous agents. The premium is justified when a wrong answer costs more than the API savings.

Choose GPT-5.4

Most production workloads: RAG, chat, coding, and content generation. GPT-5.4 is more than capable enough for these tasks at half the price.

Related comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
The workhorse model pricing showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Frontier reasoning versus optimized price-performance.
Read comparison ➜
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Large 3
Serverless pricing versus flagship open weights.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Fast, lightweight multimodal models comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding workhorses and reasoning model showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speedy utility model versus premium reasoning flagship.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4
Utility cost versus premium flagship performance.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
Optimized premium intelligence confrontation.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Rapid response utility models compared.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
Ultra-low-cost utility endpoints comparison.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7
The frontier intelligence showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5
Anthropic's refreshed flagship versus OpenAI's frontier reasoning engine.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Anthropic's refined flagship versus Google's context-window king.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premium frontier intelligence versus budget-optimized utility.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 Pro vs o3 Pro
Pro-tier specialized reasoning comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premier coding engine versus price-performance champion.
Read comparison ➜
o4-mini vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Reasoning capabilities versus standard speed-optimized utility.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
High-frequency entry-level endpoints comparison.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Mistral Codestral
Developer-focused auto-complete and refactoring endpoints.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Low-latency streaming models compared.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7
Large-context reasoning versus frontier flagship reasoning.
Read comparison ➜
Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Large 3
Utility-scale model versus flagship Europe-hosted logic.
Read comparison ➜
Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Lightweight utility versus balanced medium-scale logic.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.7
The sensible default vs the no-compromise flagship — is the premium justified?
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4
Google's 2M-token flagship vs OpenAI's cost-efficient workhorse.
Read comparison ➜