Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol: which flagship reasoning model is cheaper?

On raw price, Claude Opus 5 wins marginally (cheaper output). Pick whichever model is smarter at your specific workload - the cost gap is small enough that quality should be the tiebreaker.

Same-tier flagship reasoning from Anthropic and OpenAI, almost identical input pricing.

Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol are the two top-tier reasoning models from Anthropic and OpenAI's 2026 generation. Their input prices match exactly at $5.00 per million. The deciding factor on cost is the output price, where Opus 5 is ~17% cheaper.

By TechCompare · Updated

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.

Option A
Claude Opus 5
Wins 1 of 5 compared specs
Option B
GPT-5.6 Sol
Wins 1 of 5 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 Sol
Input Cost (per M)$5.00$5.00
Output Cost (per M)$25.00 (better on this spec)$30.00
Cached Input (per M)$0.50$0.50
Batch Discount50%50%
Context Window1M1.05M (better on this spec)

How they differ

Claude Opus 5 is priced at $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens, with a 90% caching discount ($0.50 per million) and a 50% batch discount. GPT-5.6 Sol is priced at $5.00 per million input tokens and $30.00 per million output tokens, also with a 90% caching discount ($0.50 per million) and a 50% batch discount. For a typical 100K input + 10K output request, Opus 5 costs $0.75 and Sol costs $0.80 - a small gap at single-request scale, but a $50K difference over a million calls. On capability, both target the same 'hardest reasoning tier' but lean on different strengths: Opus 5's long-context agentic tool use vs Sol's math and code synthesis.

Verdict

On raw price, Claude Opus 5 wins marginally (cheaper output). Pick whichever model is smarter at your specific workload - the cost gap is small enough that quality should be the tiebreaker.

Which should you pick?

Choose Claude Opus 5

Long-context agentic chains, tool-heavy automations, and Anthropic-flavored instruction following. Opus 5's 1M context and mature tool-use ecosystem pay off when you push the model hard.

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol

Math-heavy scientific reasoning, code synthesis, and pipelines where OpenAI's tooling ecosystem is already wired in. Sol's premium output cost is real but the 90% cache discount absorbs it on cache-heavy workloads.

Related comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
The workhorse model pricing showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Frontier reasoning versus optimized price-performance.
Read comparison ➜
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Large 3
Serverless pricing versus flagship open weights.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Fast, lightweight multimodal models comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding workhorses and reasoning model showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speedy utility model versus premium reasoning flagship.
Read comparison ➜