Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7: large-context vs frontier pricing

Large-context reasoning versus frontier flagship reasoning.

Processing complex reasoning tasks at scale requires choosing a premium model. Let's compare Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k) and Claude Opus 4.7 API rates.

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.

Gemini 3.5 Flash
$5.25
Claude Haiku 4.5
$8.00
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k)
$17.00
GPT-5.4
$21.25
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$24.00
Claude Opus 4.7
$40.00
GPT-5.5
$42.50
Option A
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Wins 3 of 4 compared specs
Option B
Claude Opus 4.7
Wins 0 of 4 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.7
Input Cost (per M)$2.00 (better on this spec)$5.00
Output Cost (per M)$12.00 (better on this spec)$25.00
Cached Input (per M)$0.20 (better on this spec)$0.50
Batch Discount50%50%

How they differ

Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k) costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens, with a 90% caching discount. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens, also with a 90% caching discount.

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro is more than 2x cheaper on both inputs and outputs, representing a highly economical premium frontier tier. Claude Opus 4.7 is reserved for absolute top-tier intelligence requirements.

Which should you pick?

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

Ultra-long context windows (up to 2M tokens), high-caching search datasets.

Choose Claude Opus 4.7

Flagship executive reasoning tasks, multi-step code planning, and maximum logical accuracy.

Related comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
The workhorse model pricing showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Frontier reasoning versus optimized price-performance.
Read comparison ➜
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Large 3
Serverless pricing versus flagship open weights.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Fast, lightweight multimodal models comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding workhorses and reasoning model showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speedy utility model versus premium reasoning flagship.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4
Utility cost versus premium flagship performance.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
Optimized premium intelligence confrontation.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Rapid response utility models compared.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
Ultra-low-cost utility endpoints comparison.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7
The frontier intelligence showdown.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premium frontier intelligence versus budget-optimized utility.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 Pro vs o3 Pro
Pro-tier specialized reasoning comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premier coding engine versus price-performance champion.
Read comparison ➜
o4-mini vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Reasoning capabilities versus standard speed-optimized utility.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
High-frequency entry-level endpoints comparison.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Mistral Codestral
Developer-focused auto-complete and refactoring endpoints.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Low-latency streaming models compared.
Read comparison ➜
Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Large 3
Utility-scale model versus flagship Europe-hosted logic.
Read comparison ➜
Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Lightweight utility versus balanced medium-scale logic.
Read comparison ➜