TechCompare LogoTechCompare

GLM-5.3-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: real-time API costs

For 100K input and 5K output, GLM costs $0.0175 uncached versus DeepSeek's $0.018 off-peak. At 50% cached input, DeepSeek off-peak wins at $0.01065 versus $0.0115.

Cache hits can change the cheaper option off-peak. Compare Z.ai and DeepSeek's direct rates.

GLM-5.3-Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash have the same $0.15 per million uncached-input rate during DeepSeek's off-peak period. GLM has the lower output price, while DeepSeek has the lower cache-hit price. The cheaper real-time request therefore depends on how much input is reused and when DeepSeek processes the work. This comparison uses Z.ai and DeepSeek's own USD tables, checked on October 4, 2026. The chart includes both DeepSeek periods so the off-peak estimate isn't mistaken for an all-day rate.

By TechCompare · Updated

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Normal-speed, real-time provider USD rates, checked October 4, 2026.

DeepSeek: V4.1 Flash (off-peak)
$1.07
Z.ai: GLM-5.3-Flash
$1.15
DeepSeek: V4.1 Flash (peak)
$2.13
Option A
GLM-5.3-Flash
Wins 3 of 9 compared specs
Option B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Wins 1 of 9 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecGLM-5.3-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Uncached input per 1M tokens
$0.15
$0.15 off-peak / $0.30 peak
Output per 1M tokens
$0.50 (better on this spec)
$0.60 off-peak / $1.20 peak
Cache-hit input per 1M tokens
$0.03
$0.003 off-peak / $0.006 peak (better on this spec)
100K input + 5K output, no cache hits
$0.0175 (better on this spec)
$0.018 off-peak / $0.036 peak
100K input + 5K output, 50% input cached
$0.0115
$0.01065 off-peak / $0.0213 peak
100K input + 5K output, all input cached
$0.0055
$0.0033 off-peak / $0.0066 peak
100,000 requests, 50% input cached
$1,150
$1,065 off-peak / $2,130 peak
Aggregate 1M input + 1M output, no cache hits
$0.65 (better on this spec)
$0.75 off-peak / $1.50 peak
Provider / delivery mode
Z.ai / normal-speed real-time
DeepSeek / normal-speed real-time

How they differ

Z.ai charges $0.15 uncached input, $0.03 cached input, and $0.50 output per million tokens for GLM-5.3-Flash. DeepSeek charges $0.15, $0.003, and $0.60 off-peak, doubling those categories to $0.30, $0.006, and $1.20 at peak. A 100,000-input, 5,000-output request without cache hits costs $0.0175 on GLM and $0.018 on DeepSeek off-peak. GLM is about 2.78% cheaper in that example. With half the input cached, GLM costs $0.0115 and DeepSeek off-peak costs $0.01065, making DeepSeek about 7.39% cheaper. DeepSeek at peak costs $0.0213 for the same half-cached call. The starting chart multiplies those values by 100 monthly requests. DeepSeek's peak periods are 01:00 to 04:00 UTC and 06:00 to 10:00 UTC on weekdays, excluding Chinese public holidays. Other hours are off-peak. At 100K input and 5K output, the off-peak comparison flips at about 18.52% cached input. That threshold changes with output length, so an application with long generated answers can favor GLM even when an input-heavy workload favors DeepSeek.

Verdict

Use cache usage and request timing from your application to choose a pricing scenario. GLM has a lower output rate and doesn't use the peak schedule shown in DeepSeek's table. DeepSeek's low cache-hit rate can favor repeated long prefixes, especially outside peak periods. A model's accepted task quality, tool behavior, and total output usage still need testing. Apply these prices to measured complete tasks instead of choosing from an uncached rate or an isolated benchmark alone.

Which should you pick?

Choose GLM-5.3-Flash

Choose GLM when your evaluation favors its results or your traffic generates enough output for its $0.50 rate to matter. It is also a candidate when interactive requests often land in DeepSeek's peak hours and you can't change that timing. Test the actual coding, document, and visual tasks you need. Track reasoning output and cache hits, since the provider's model guide says GLM-5.3-Flash thinking can't be disabled.

Z.ai's official API pricing

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Choose DeepSeek when it passes your quality checks and your workload repeatedly reuses long input prefixes. Its off-peak cache-hit rate is one tenth GLM's, which can overcome the higher output rate. Jobs with flexible delivery timing can be scheduled outside peak periods. For live traffic that needs immediate processing, include the expected share of peak calls and avoid quoting the off-peak total as the whole month's bill.

DeepSeek's official API pricing

Related comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Compare Xiaomi's normal-speed real-time rates, cache savings, and the cost of successful tasks.
Read comparison ➜
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Compare Xiaomi's flat real-time rates with DeepSeek's peak and off-peak token prices.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Luna's base input and output rates are 20 times lower. Compare the cost of a successful result.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Luna's base token rates are ten times lower. Task quality and integration decide whether switching pays off.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5
Sol costs half as much at base rates, but its long-prompt surcharge narrows the gap.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Both charge $2 input and $10 output per million tokens. Cache reuse and prompt length separate them.
Read comparison ➜

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less without prompt caching?
During DeepSeek's off-peak period, the uncached-input rate ties at $0.15 per million tokens. GLM's $0.50 output rate is below DeepSeek's $0.60, so a request with generated output costs less on GLM at equal token counts. At peak, DeepSeek's uncached input and output rates both rise. With 100K input and 5K output, GLM costs $0.0175 versus $0.018 off-peak or $0.036 peak.
When does DeepSeek's cache price outweigh GLM's cheaper output?
Off-peak, each million cache-hit tokens saves $0.027 relative to GLM, while each million generated tokens adds $0.10. DeepSeek therefore wins when cached-input tokens divided by output tokens exceed about 3.704. For 100,000 total input and 5,000 output tokens, that means more than about 18,519 input tokens hitting the cache, or 18.52% of the input.
Can DeepSeek cost less during peak hours?
Yes, with enough cached input relative to generated output. For a fully cached 100K-token prompt and 1K output tokens, DeepSeek peak costs $0.0018 versus GLM's $0.0035. For the article's 100K-input, 5K-output workload, GLM remains cheaper throughout the entire 0% to 100% cache range. The output length changes the answer, so calculate the complete request instead of comparing the cache rate alone.
Should I use equal token counts to compare application costs?
Equal counts explain the price structure, but the same task can have different billed usage on each model. Test representative prompts and count reasoning output, retries, tool results, and accepted outcomes. A model that finishes in fewer calls can change the cost comparison. Group DeepSeek requests by their actual billing period, then compare the total spending required to deliver usable results.