TechCompare LogoTechCompare

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: direct API pricing

The half-cached 100K-input, 5K-output example costs $0.00854 on MiMo versus $0.01065 on DeepSeek off-peak or $0.0213 at peak. MiMo has lower rates in every token category.

Compare Xiaomi's flat real-time rates with DeepSeek's peak and off-peak token prices.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has lower input, output, and cache-hit prices than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash even during DeepSeek's off-peak period. Xiaomi's normal-speed real-time rates are $0.14 uncached input and $0.28 output per million tokens, compared with DeepSeek's off-peak $0.15 and $0.60. The lower token bill makes MiMo worth evaluating for frequent traffic, but the application still needs results that pass its quality checks. This comparison uses both makers' own USD prices, checked on October 4, 2026.

By TechCompare · Updated

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Normal-speed, real-time provider USD rates, checked October 4, 2026.

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash
$0.85
DeepSeek: V4.1 Flash (off-peak)
$1.07
DeepSeek: V4.1 Flash (peak)
$2.13
Option A
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Wins 8 of 9 compared specs
Option B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Wins 0 of 9 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecMiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Uncached input per 1M tokens
$0.14 (better on this spec)
$0.15 off-peak / $0.30 peak
Output per 1M tokens
$0.28 (better on this spec)
$0.60 off-peak / $1.20 peak
Cache-hit input per 1M tokens
$0.0028 (better on this spec)
$0.003 off-peak / $0.006 peak
100K input + 5K output, no cache hits
$0.0154 (better on this spec)
$0.018 off-peak / $0.036 peak
100K input + 5K output, 50% input cached
$0.00854 (better on this spec)
$0.01065 off-peak / $0.0213 peak
100K input + 5K output, all input cached
$0.00168 (better on this spec)
$0.0033 off-peak / $0.0066 peak
100,000 requests, 50% input cached
$854 (better on this spec)
$1,065 off-peak / $2,130 peak
Aggregate 1M input + 1M output, no cache hits
$0.42 (better on this spec)
$0.75 off-peak / $1.50 peak
Provider / delivery mode
Xiaomi / normal-speed real-time
DeepSeek / normal-speed real-time

How they differ

Xiaomi charges $0.0028 per million cache-hit input tokens. DeepSeek charges $0.003 off-peak and $0.006 at peak. For 100,000 input and 5,000 output tokens without cache hits, MiMo costs $0.0154 and DeepSeek costs $0.018 off-peak or $0.036 peak. With half the input cached, the totals become $0.00854, $0.01065, and $0.0213. At 100,000 requests, the half-cached estimates are $854 on MiMo, $1,065 on DeepSeek off-peak, and $2,130 on DeepSeek peak. The starting chart displays the same workload at 100 monthly requests, rounded to $0.85, $1.07, and $2.13. MiMo is about 19.81% cheaper than DeepSeek off-peak in that example. The output rate difference becomes more visible for long answers: Across requests totaling 1M uncached input and 1M output tokens, the cost is $0.42 on MiMo versus $0.75 off-peak or $1.50 peak on DeepSeek. DeepSeek's peak periods are 01:00 to 04:00 UTC and 06:00 to 10:00 UTC on weekdays, excluding Chinese public holidays. All other hours are off-peak. Both chart periods use its normal-speed real-time API.

Verdict

Price favors MiMo at equal billed token counts, including for fully cached input. Choose between the models by testing the work your application actually performs. Measure accepted results, generated reasoning, retries, review time, and all tool turns. A reliable result with fewer attempts can outweigh a modest per-call saving. For DeepSeek traffic, split the monthly estimate by billing period so an off-peak example doesn't hide peak spending on interactive requests.

Which should you pick?

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Choose MiMo when it meets your quality target and its lower real-time rates reduce the cost of sustained traffic. Output-heavy workloads can benefit especially from the $0.28 output rate. Check actual token usage and keep the output focused on a usable result. Xiaomi bills overseas web search separately, so include that service when an agent repeatedly searches instead of treating the text-token chart as the entire budget.

Xiaomi's official API pricing

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Choose DeepSeek when tests show that its behavior, integration, or accepted task outcomes justify the extra spending. A production application should compare complete tasks rather than assume equal token usage from a single prompt. If your workload can run outside peak periods, use the off-peak row in the budget. For requests that must run immediately, apply the expected mixture of peak and off-peak traffic and track usage per period.

DeepSeek's official API pricing

Related comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Compare Xiaomi's normal-speed real-time rates, cache savings, and the cost of successful tasks.
Read comparison ➜
GLM-5.3-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Cache hits can change the cheaper option off-peak. Compare Z.ai and DeepSeek's direct rates.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Luna's base input and output rates are 20 times lower. Compare the cost of a successful result.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Luna's base token rates are ten times lower. Task quality and integration decide whether switching pays off.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5
Sol costs half as much at base rates, but its long-prompt surcharge narrows the gap.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Both charge $2 input and $10 output per million tokens. Cache reuse and prompt length separate them.
Read comparison ➜

Frequently asked questions

How much does MiMo save on the half-cached example?
At 100,000 input tokens, half cached, and 5,000 output tokens, MiMo costs $0.00854 versus DeepSeek's $0.01065 off-peak. That is about 19.81% less. Across 100,000 requests, the saving is $211. Against DeepSeek peak's $0.0213 per call, MiMo saves $1,276 across that volume. These savings assume equal billed token usage and the same number of attempts.
Can DeepSeek's cache rate make it cheaper than MiMo?
At equal real-time token counts, no. MiMo's $0.0028 cache-hit rate is below DeepSeek's $0.003 off-peak rate, and its uncached input and output rates are also lower. The difference becomes smaller for cached input alone, but it doesn't reverse. Actual task costs can still differ if a model generates less output or completes work with fewer attempts.
Why does output length matter in this comparison?
MiMo output is $0.28 per million tokens versus DeepSeek's $0.60 off-peak and $1.20 peak. With 100K input, half cached, and 50K output tokens, the totals are $0.02114 on MiMo, $0.03765 on DeepSeek off-peak, and $0.0753 at peak. Include billed reasoning output as well as the visible answer when measuring requests that produce long explanations.
What if DeepSeek completes the task in fewer calls?
Then compare the cost of accepted tasks rather than equal request counts. In the half-cached 100K-input, 5K-output example, two MiMo attempts cost $0.01708, which is more than one DeepSeek off-peak attempt at $0.01065. That doesn't predict either model's reliability. It shows why evaluations should record failures and retries alongside token prices.