MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: real-time API pricing
At Xiaomi's direct real-time rates, the half-cached 100K-input, 5K-output request costs $0.02628 on Pro and $0.00854 on Flash. Flash cuts that token estimate by about 67.50%.
Compare Xiaomi's normal-speed real-time rates, cache savings, and the cost of successful tasks.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash has lower input, output, and cache-hit rates than MiMo-V2.6-Pro on Xiaomi's direct API. Uncached input and output are about 67.82% cheaper, while cached input is about 22.22% cheaper. That makes Flash a useful starting point for evaluating frequent calls. Pro needs to earn its higher spending through results on your own workload. This comparison uses normal-speed real-time USD prices checked on October 4, 2026, so each chart row and worked example uses the same delivery mode.
By TechCompare · Updated
Cost Comparison
Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Normal-speed, real-time provider USD rates, checked October 4, 2026.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time uncached input per 1M tokens | $0.435 | $0.14 (better on this spec) |
| Real-time output per 1M tokens | $0.87 | $0.28 (better on this spec) |
| Cache-hit input per 1M tokens | $0.0036 | $0.0028 (better on this spec) |
| 100K input + 5K output, no cache hits | $0.04785 | $0.0154 (better on this spec) |
| 100K input + 5K output, 50% input cached | $0.02628 | $0.00854 (better on this spec) |
| 100K input + 5K output, all input cached | $0.00471 | $0.00168 (better on this spec) |
| 10,000 requests, 50% input cached | $262.80 | $85.40 (better on this spec) |
| Provider / delivery mode | Xiaomi / normal-speed real-time | Xiaomi / normal-speed real-time |
| Cache writes | Limited-time free | Limited-time free |
How they differ
Xiaomi charges Pro $0.435 per million uncached input tokens, $0.0036 for cache hits, and $0.87 for output. Flash costs $0.14, $0.0028, and $0.28 for those categories. A request with 100,000 input and 5,000 output tokens costs $0.04785 on Pro or $0.0154 on Flash without cache hits. When half the input is cached, the totals become $0.02628 and $0.00854. At 10,000 requests, that is $262.80 versus $85.40. The starting chart shows 100 monthly requests, rounded to $2.63 and $0.85. Pro costs about 3.08 times as much on that half-cached workload. With all input cached, the same call costs $0.00471 on Pro and $0.00168 on Flash, so the ratio falls to about 2.80. Cached input narrows the difference, but Flash remains cheaper on each token category. These are equal-usage examples. The same prompt can lead to different reasoning output or additional calls, so measure billed usage and accepted results for a complete task before treating the price ratio as a quality-adjusted saving.
Verdict
Start by testing Flash on tasks with clear acceptance checks. Evaluate Pro on cases that Flash fails or that require costly review, then compare all billed tokens and repeated attempts for each accepted result. Cache-heavy input reduces the price gap somewhat, but it doesn't make the models equal in cost. Route work using measured task outcomes and spending. An automated retry policy also needs limits so a low-cost first call doesn't grow into an open-ended series of attempts.
Which should you pick?
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Choose Pro when tests show that it finishes demanding tasks with less rework or produces results that justify its higher real-time rate. Try representative code changes, planning tasks, and document analysis with the same success checks you use in production. Record output tokens and tool turns for the complete workflow. A higher price doesn't establish an advantage by itself, and a short final answer doesn't reveal how much reasoning the service billed.
Xiaomi's direct API ratesChoose MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Choose Flash when it meets your quality target for a large share of traffic. Its lower real-time input and output rates are useful for repeated transformations, extraction, and coding requests that you can verify automatically. Reuse stable context where the API reports cache hits, then keep generated output focused on the requested result. Consider a Pro fallback for failures, while counting the Flash attempt in that fallback task's total cost.
MiMo Flash pricing examples