GPT-5.4 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: the absolute bottom-tier cost face-off

Ultra-low-cost utility endpoints comparison.

For extremely high-frequency, low-budget tasks, ultra-lightweight models are perfect. GPT-5.4 Nano and DeepSeek V4 Flash are leading options.

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.

DeepSeek V4 Flash
$0.85
GPT-5.4 Nano
$1.73
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$5.25
Claude Haiku 4.5
$8.00
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k)
$17.00
GPT-5.4
$21.25
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$24.00
Claude Opus 4.7
$40.00
GPT-5.5
$42.50
Option A
GPT-5.4 Nano
Wins 1 of 4 compared specs
Option B
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Wins 3 of 4 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecGPT-5.4 NanoDeepSeek V4 Flash
Input Cost (per M)$0.20$0.14 (better on this spec)
Output Cost (per M)$1.25$0.28 (better on this spec)
Cached Input (per M)$0.02$0.0028 (better on this spec)
Batch Discount50% (better on this spec)0%

How they differ

GPT-5.4 Nano is priced at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash costs just $0.14 per million input and $0.28 per million output, featuring a 98% caching discount.

Verdict

DeepSeek V4 Flash is much cheaper, especially on output costs. It is the optimal choice for high-volume, low-cost operations.

Which should you pick?

Choose GPT-5.4 Nano

Ultra-budget OpenAI pipelines and rapid classification runs.

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash

Extremely high-volume pipelines, text summaries, and low-cost databases.

Related comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
The workhorse model pricing showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Frontier reasoning versus optimized price-performance.
Read comparison ➜
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Large 3
Serverless pricing versus flagship open weights.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Fast, lightweight multimodal models comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding workhorses and reasoning model showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speedy utility model versus premium reasoning flagship.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4
Utility cost versus premium flagship performance.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
Optimized premium intelligence confrontation.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Rapid response utility models compared.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7
The frontier intelligence showdown.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premium frontier intelligence versus budget-optimized utility.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 Pro vs o3 Pro
Pro-tier specialized reasoning comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premier coding engine versus price-performance champion.
Read comparison ➜
o4-mini vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Reasoning capabilities versus standard speed-optimized utility.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
High-frequency entry-level endpoints comparison.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Mistral Codestral
Developer-focused auto-complete and refactoring endpoints.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Low-latency streaming models compared.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7
Large-context reasoning versus frontier flagship reasoning.
Read comparison ➜
Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Large 3
Utility-scale model versus flagship Europe-hosted logic.
Read comparison ➜
Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Lightweight utility versus balanced medium-scale logic.
Read comparison ➜