Grok 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5: which costs less per call, and what about context?

By TechCompare · Updated · How we check

Grok 4.5 wins on output price and total per-call cost. Pick Sonnet 5 when you need more than 500K context, Anthropic's tool-calling ecosystem, or a deeper cache discount for highly repetitive prompts.

SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5

xAI's own price

Input
$2
Output
$6
Cached
$0.30

per 1M tokens

Price checked 2026-11-12

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic's own price

Input
$2
Output
$10
Cached
$0.20

per 1M tokens

Batch available

Price checked 2026-11-12

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Prices come live from OpenRouter at each maker's own price where it's listed. Temporary deals are left out.

Loading model prices

Grok 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 5 sit at the same $2.00 per million input price. Output runs $6 vs $10, and context size splits at 500K vs 1M. The choice for most buyers comes down to output volume and ecosystem lock-in.

Two mid-tier workhorses from different ecosystems. Compare input and output rates side by side.

Side-by-side specs

SpecGrok 4.5Claude Sonnet 5
Input Cost (per M)
$2.00
$2.00
Output Cost (per M)
$6.00 (better on this spec)
$10.00
Cached Input (per M)Cached input is text the provider has already processed. It costs less than fresh input.
$0.30
$0.20 (better on this spec)
Batch input / output (per M)
None
$1.00 / $5.00
Context Window
500K
1M (better on this spec)

How they differ

Grok 4.5 is priced at $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens, with an 85% caching discount ($0.30 per million) and a 500K context window. Above 200,000 tokens of prompt, its rates rise to $4 input and $12 output. Claude Sonnet 5 is priced at $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens, with a 90% caching discount ($0.20 per million) and a 1M context window plus Anthropic's mature tool-calling ecosystem.

For a 100K input + 10K output request, Grok 4.5 costs $0.26 vs Sonnet 5's $0.30, so Grok wins the call, helped by an output price about 40% lower. Sonnet 5 counters with double the context window, a deeper prompt caching discount, and Anthropic's tooling maturity.

Verdict

The verdict splits cleanly by workload: output-heavy live calls go Grok, agentic loops with long context and repetitive prompts go Sonnet. Grok wins the output row at $6.00/M against $10.00, about 40% lower. A 100K input + 10K output call costs $0.26 on Grok versus $0.30 on Sonnet. Sonnet counters on cache ($0.20/M versus $0.30/M), Sonnet has batch prices ($1.00/$5.00) where Grok has none, and context favors Sonnet (1M versus 500K).

Which should you pick?

Choose Grok 4.5

Output-heavy workloads under 500K context where the lower output price matters and prompts stay under 200,000 tokens. Grok 4.5's $6/M output vs Sonnet 5's $10/M is real savings at scale.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5

Workloads above 500K context, agentic tasks relying on Anthropic's mature tool-calling, or repetitive prompts where Sonnet 5's 90% cache discount can outweigh the output premium.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 5 cheaper per call?
Grok 4.5. It charges $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output versus Sonnet 5's $2.00/M and $10.00/M, so a 100K input + 10K output request costs $0.26 on Grok versus $0.30 on Sonnet 5. Grok's output price is about 40% lower, a gap that compounds on output-heavy work.
When does Claude Sonnet 5 beat Grok 4.5 on price?
On cached input alone. Sonnet 5 charges $0.20/M against Grok 4.5's $0.30/M, but a fully cached 100K-token prompt with 5K output costs $0.07 on Sonnet 5 versus $0.06 on Grok, so output has to stay small for the cache edge to win the call. In batch mode Sonnet 5 drops to $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output, below Grok's $2.00/$6.00, and Grok has no batch prices. Long prompts matter too: above 200,000 tokens, Grok's rates rise to $4 input and $12 output, while Sonnet 5 stays at $2/$10. On context, Sonnet 5 has 1M against Grok's 500K.
What's the context window difference and why does it matter?
Sonnet 5 has a 1M context window, Grok 4.5 has 500K. For long-document analysis, RAG over very large contexts, and multi-file code work that exceeds 500K tokens, Sonnet 5 is the only option. Below that threshold, Grok's lower output price wins, though its rates rise above 200,000 tokens of prompt.