Mistral Large 4 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: API pricing and self hosting
For the half cached 100,000 input, 5,000 output request, Mistral Large 4 costs $0.049 and Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $0.16. The API price is one of two routes here, since both models ship open weights and the hardware bill looks very different from the token bill.
Mistral Large 4 has the lower rate on both sides of the bill: $0.70 per million input tokens against $2 for Kimi K3.1 Pro, and $2.10 against $10 on output. Both publish open weights, which gives you a second route that no API price list shows: running the model on your own hardware. This page prices the API route first, with three workloads, and then covers when self hosting is worth a look.
Two open weight models with API rates, cache reads, and a self hosting route to weigh.
By TechCompare · Updated
Mistral: Mistral Large 4
Mistral's own price
- Input
- $0.70
- Output
- $2.10
- Cached
- $0.07
per 1M tokens
Price checked 2026-11-07
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI's own price
- Input
- $2
- Output
- $10
- Cached
- $0.20
per 1M tokens
Price checked 2026-11-07
Cost Comparison
Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Prices come live from OpenRouter at each maker's own price where it's listed. Temporary deals are left out.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Mistral Large 4 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Standard input per 1M tokens | $0.70 (better on this spec) | $2.00 |
| Standard output per 1M tokens | $2.10 (better on this spec) | $10.00 |
| Cache reads per 1M tokens | $0.07 (better on this spec) | $0.20 |
| 100K input + 5K output, no cache hits | $0.0805 (better on this spec) | $0.25 |
| 100K input + 5K output, half the input cached | $0.049 (better on this spec) | $0.16 |
| Agent session, 40 turns of 60K input, 2K output | $0.6384 (better on this spec) | $2.144 |
| Input / output on long prompts, per 1M | Standard rates | Standard rates |
| Batch API input / output per 1M | None | None |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Input types | Text, image | Text, image, video |
| Parameters, total / active | About 1T / 52B | 2.78T / 104B |
| Weights license | Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License | Custom license |
How they differ
Mistral Large 4 lists at $0.70 per million input tokens, $0.07 for cache reads and $2.10 per million output tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro lists at $2, $0.20 and $10. Three workloads show how those rates play out. An agent session with 40 turns, each carrying 60,000 input tokens and producing 2,000 output tokens, with four in five input tokens read from cache, costs $0.6384 on Mistral and $2.144 on Kimi. A nightly job that summarizes 20,000 documents of 30,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens each, with no cache hits, costs $483 and $1,500. Neither lists batch prices, so the job runs at the standard rates. A chat product with 1,000,000 conversations a month, at 4,000 input tokens and 600 output tokens each and half the input cached, comes to $2,800 and $10,400. On the standard 100,000 input, 5,000 output request with half the input cached, Mistral costs $0.049 and Kimi costs $0.16, so Kimi's bill is 3.3 times Mistral's. Long prompts need their own check. Mistral lists no separate long prompt rate. Kimi lists no separate long prompt rate. A 400,000 input token request with 4,000 output tokens and no cache hits costs $0.2884 on Mistral and $0.84 on Kimi. Kimi's weights are open, so other hosts can serve it. Relace lists Kimi K3.1 Pro at $0.3287 input and $8.115 output, running fp4 weights, so check which quantization you're buying before you compare it with the maker's price. No host is listed below the Mistral price shown. These figures leave out cache writes and tool fees.
Verdict
Start with the shape of your traffic. Mistral reads cached input at $0.07 per million tokens against Kimi's $0.20, which matters for agents that resend a long prefix every turn. Output-heavy work such as reasoning traces and long code diffs leans on the output rate, and document pipelines lean on the input rate. Then think about self hosting, because it changes what you're paying for. An API charges for tokens. Your own cluster charges for memory and for the hours it sits idle. Kimi K3.1 Pro has 2.78T total parameters with 104B active per token, spread over 896 experts with 16 used per token. Mistral Large 4 has about 1T total and 52B active, with 128 routed experts and 4 used per token. Every expert has to sit in memory even though few run for each token, so total size sets the hardware and active size sets the speed. The Kimi weights are a multi node job. Open the VRAM calculator page for each model before you price a cluster, and read both licenses before commercial use.
Which should you pick?
Choose Mistral Large 4
Choose Mistral Large 4 when your tests show it finishing your tasks and you want the token bill to follow the rate card. It takes text and image input, accepts up to 1,048,576 tokens of context and can produce up to 262,144 output tokens in a single response, which suits long generated documents and big code rewrites. Self hosting is also a more reachable project here. An NVFP4 checkpoint exists for Blackwell GPUs, and GGUF versions come from ggml-org and unsloth for people who want to test locally. Weights ship under the Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License, so read it before you build a product on a private deployment.
Mistral Large 4 VRAM requirementsChoose Kimi K3.1 Pro
Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro when your own evaluations show it solving the problems that Mistral leaves unfinished, or when video input matters, since it takes text, image and video. It supports tools and reasoning, and its context window is 1,048,576 tokens. Third party hosts exist for the open weights, and one is listed today, so price that route as well as the maker's. Self hosting this one means a multi node commitment. The license is custom, so read it before commercial use, and measure your real output lengths, because reasoning tokens bill as output.
Kimi K3.1 Pro VRAM requirementsFrequently asked questions
Which costs less per request, Mistral Large 4 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Do Mistral Large 4 and Kimi K3.1 Pro have the same context window?
Can I run Mistral Large 4 or Kimi K3.1 Pro myself?
Which one accepts images and video?
Do the models have batch prices?
How much does caching save on each model?
Related pricing pages
Related tools
LLM API Pricing Calculator
Compare API costs across major models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) with prompt caching.
Use tool ➜LLM VRAM Calculator
Calculate the VRAM needed to run or fine-tune any LLM at any quantization.
Use tool ➜LLM Token Counter
Count tokens in any prompt for GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Llama with exact OpenAI tokenization.
Use tool ➜