Mistral Large 4 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: API pricing and self hosting

For the half cached 100,000 input, 5,000 output request, Mistral Large 4 costs $0.049 and Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $0.16. The API price is one of two routes here, since both models ship open weights and the hardware bill looks very different from the token bill.

Mistral Large 4 has the lower rate on both sides of the bill: $0.70 per million input tokens against $2 for Kimi K3.1 Pro, and $2.10 against $10 on output. Both publish open weights, which gives you a second route that no API price list shows: running the model on your own hardware. This page prices the API route first, with three workloads, and then covers when self hosting is worth a look.

Two open weight models with API rates, cache reads, and a self hosting route to weigh.

By TechCompare · Updated

Mistral: Mistral Large 4

Mistral's own price

Input
$0.70
Output
$2.10
Cached
$0.07

per 1M tokens

Price checked 2026-11-07

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro

Moonshot AI's own price

Input
$2
Output
$10
Cached
$0.20

per 1M tokens

Price checked 2026-11-07

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Prices come live from OpenRouter at each maker's own price where it's listed. Temporary deals are left out.

Side-by-side specs

SpecMistral Large 4Kimi K3.1 Pro
Standard input per 1M tokens
$0.70 (better on this spec)
$2.00
Standard output per 1M tokens
$2.10 (better on this spec)
$10.00
Cache reads per 1M tokens
$0.07 (better on this spec)
$0.20
100K input + 5K output, no cache hits
$0.0805 (better on this spec)
$0.25
100K input + 5K output, half the input cached
$0.049 (better on this spec)
$0.16
Agent session, 40 turns of 60K input, 2K output
$0.6384 (better on this spec)
$2.144
Input / output on long prompts, per 1M
Standard rates
Standard rates
Batch API input / output per 1M
None
None
Context window
1,048,576 tokens
1,048,576 tokens
Input types
Text, image
Text, image, video
Parameters, total / active
About 1T / 52B
2.78T / 104B
Weights license
Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License
Custom license

How they differ

Mistral Large 4 lists at $0.70 per million input tokens, $0.07 for cache reads and $2.10 per million output tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro lists at $2, $0.20 and $10. Three workloads show how those rates play out. An agent session with 40 turns, each carrying 60,000 input tokens and producing 2,000 output tokens, with four in five input tokens read from cache, costs $0.6384 on Mistral and $2.144 on Kimi. A nightly job that summarizes 20,000 documents of 30,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens each, with no cache hits, costs $483 and $1,500. Neither lists batch prices, so the job runs at the standard rates. A chat product with 1,000,000 conversations a month, at 4,000 input tokens and 600 output tokens each and half the input cached, comes to $2,800 and $10,400. On the standard 100,000 input, 5,000 output request with half the input cached, Mistral costs $0.049 and Kimi costs $0.16, so Kimi's bill is 3.3 times Mistral's. Long prompts need their own check. Mistral lists no separate long prompt rate. Kimi lists no separate long prompt rate. A 400,000 input token request with 4,000 output tokens and no cache hits costs $0.2884 on Mistral and $0.84 on Kimi. Kimi's weights are open, so other hosts can serve it. Relace lists Kimi K3.1 Pro at $0.3287 input and $8.115 output, running fp4 weights, so check which quantization you're buying before you compare it with the maker's price. No host is listed below the Mistral price shown. These figures leave out cache writes and tool fees.

Verdict

Start with the shape of your traffic. Mistral reads cached input at $0.07 per million tokens against Kimi's $0.20, which matters for agents that resend a long prefix every turn. Output-heavy work such as reasoning traces and long code diffs leans on the output rate, and document pipelines lean on the input rate. Then think about self hosting, because it changes what you're paying for. An API charges for tokens. Your own cluster charges for memory and for the hours it sits idle. Kimi K3.1 Pro has 2.78T total parameters with 104B active per token, spread over 896 experts with 16 used per token. Mistral Large 4 has about 1T total and 52B active, with 128 routed experts and 4 used per token. Every expert has to sit in memory even though few run for each token, so total size sets the hardware and active size sets the speed. The Kimi weights are a multi node job. Open the VRAM calculator page for each model before you price a cluster, and read both licenses before commercial use.

Which should you pick?

Choose Mistral Large 4

Choose Mistral Large 4 when your tests show it finishing your tasks and you want the token bill to follow the rate card. It takes text and image input, accepts up to 1,048,576 tokens of context and can produce up to 262,144 output tokens in a single response, which suits long generated documents and big code rewrites. Self hosting is also a more reachable project here. An NVFP4 checkpoint exists for Blackwell GPUs, and GGUF versions come from ggml-org and unsloth for people who want to test locally. Weights ship under the Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License, so read it before you build a product on a private deployment.

Mistral Large 4 VRAM requirements

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro when your own evaluations show it solving the problems that Mistral leaves unfinished, or when video input matters, since it takes text, image and video. It supports tools and reasoning, and its context window is 1,048,576 tokens. Third party hosts exist for the open weights, and one is listed today, so price that route as well as the maker's. Self hosting this one means a multi node commitment. The license is custom, so read it before commercial use, and measure your real output lengths, because reasoning tokens bill as output.

Kimi K3.1 Pro VRAM requirements

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less per request, Mistral Large 4 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Mistral Large 4 does on the standard example. With 100,000 input tokens, half of them cached, and 5,000 output tokens, it costs $0.049 against $0.16 for Kimi K3.1 Pro. That ranking can flip with your mix of input and output, so price your own request sizes. Retries, reasoning tokens and tool turns change the bill for a finished task.
Do Mistral Large 4 and Kimi K3.1 Pro have the same context window?
Both have 1,048,576 tokens of context. Mistral Large 4 also lists a 262,144 token cap on a single response. Neither lists a separate long prompt rate, so the standard rates apply across the window. A big window doesn't make a big prompt a good idea, and retrieval often keeps the bill down.
Can I run Mistral Large 4 or Kimi K3.1 Pro myself?
Both publish open weights on Hugging Face, so yes in principle. In practice these are very large mixture of experts models. Kimi K3.1 Pro has 2.78T total parameters and needs a multi node setup. Mistral Large 4 has about 1T total parameters, with an NVFP4 checkpoint for Blackwell GPUs and GGUF builds from ggml-org and unsloth. The VRAM calculator pages for each model give the memory budget at your context length. Add hosting, engineering time and idle hours before you compare that with a token bill, and read each license first.
Which one accepts images and video?
Mistral Large 4 takes text and image input. Kimi K3.1 Pro takes text, image and video. If your pipeline sends video frames or clips, Kimi is the only one of the two that lists it. For image only work both qualify, so the comparison goes back to price and your own accuracy tests on your documents or screenshots.
Do the models have batch prices?
Neither has a batch price in the data, so a nightly job pays the standard rates. Batch jobs wait longer for results, so they suit work that nobody is watching.
How much does caching save on each model?
A cache read is 90% lower than the uncached input rate on both models. Only the part of the prompt that's read from cache gets that rate, and cache writes bill separately. For the agent session in the examples, four in five input tokens are cache reads, and the totals are $0.6384 and $2.144. Measure your real hit rate before trusting a discount.