TechCompare LogoTechCompare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: the developer API cost face-off

Gemini 3.1 Pro is more economical on short-context base and cached costs. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is preferred if you need Anthropic's coding and instruction-following strengths or its pricing fits your prompts above Gemini's 200K tier boundary.

Coding workhorses and reasoning model showdown.

For complex coding and agentic reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Sonnet 4.6 are the top contenders. Their cost structures depend heavily on prompt caching efficiency.

By TechCompare · Updated

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Prices are fetched live from OpenRouter and may include temporary promotional discounts not accounted for in our article and comparison figures.

Option A
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k)
Wins 3 of 4 compared specs
Option B
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Wins 0 of 4 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k)Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input Cost (per M)
$2.00 (better on this spec)
$3.00
Output Cost (per M)
$12.00 (better on this spec)
$15.00
Cached Input (per M)
$0.20 (better on this spec)
$0.30
Batch Discount
50%
50%

How they differ

For prompts up to 200K tokens, Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens, with a 90% cache discount to $0.20/M. Its rates rise to $4.00/M input, $18.00/M output, and $0.40/M cached input above 200K. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is priced at $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens, with cached input at $0.30/M.

Verdict

For prompts up to 200K, Gemini charges $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output against Sonnet's $3.00 and $15.00, so it wins both base rows by 33% on input and 20% on output. Gemini also wins cached input at $0.20/M against Sonnet's $0.30/M. Both discounts are 90%. Sonnet's edges are its tool use and instruction following, while Gemini offers a 1M context window against Sonnet's 500K. Above 200K, Gemini's standard rates rise to $4.00/M input and $18.00/M output, so check the long-context tier before choosing.

Which should you pick?

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k)

Long-context processing up to 1M tokens, native multimodal input, and lower costs for prompts up to 200K.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6

State-of-the-art multi-file code editing, tool use, and agentic loops.

Related comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Compare Xiaomi's normal-speed real-time rates, cache savings, and the cost of successful tasks.
Read comparison ➜
GLM-5.3-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Cache hits can change the cheaper option off-peak. Compare Z.ai and DeepSeek's direct rates.
Read comparison ➜
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Compare Xiaomi's flat real-time rates with DeepSeek's peak and off-peak token prices.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Luna's base input and output rates are 20 times lower. Compare the cost of a successful result.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Luna's base token rates are ten times lower. Task quality and integration decide whether switching pays off.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5
Sol costs half as much at base rates, but its long-prompt surcharge narrows the gap.
Read comparison ➜

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude Sonnet 4.6 cheaper for long-context coding?
It depends on prompt length. Up to 200K tokens, Gemini costs $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output against Sonnet's $3.00/M and $15.00/M. Gemini's rates rise to $4.00/M input and $18.00/M output above 200K, so check the applicable long-context tier. Gemini offers a larger 1M context window against Sonnet 4.6's 500K.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Gemini 3.1 Pro offers about 1M tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers 500K. For multi-file code analysis, RAG over large corpora, or whole-book synthesis, Gemini's roughly 2x larger window reduces chunking overhead. Sonnet 4.6's smaller window is rarely the bottleneck for agentic loops with cached context.
How do the prompt caching discounts compare?
Both models apply a 90% discount to cached input at the listed short-context tier. Gemini 3.1 Pro drops from $2.00/M to $0.20/M, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 drops from $3.00/M to $0.30/M. Gemini therefore stays cheaper on cached input for prompts up to 200K.