GPT-5.6 Luna vs MiniMax-M3: utility LLM pricing showdown

By TechCompare · Updated · How we check

Luna is the cheaper of the two per token for utility work. MiniMax-M3 is the pick when MiniMax's specific reasoning profile suits the task better than OpenAI's.

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI's own price

Input
$0.20
Output
$1.20
Cached
$0.02

per 1M tokens

Batch availableFlex available

Price checked 2026-11-12

MiniMax: MiniMax M3

Cheapest host: GMICloud (fp8)

Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
Cached
$0.06

per 1M tokens

Batch availableFlex available

Price checked 2026-11-12

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Prices come live from OpenRouter at each maker's own price where it's listed. Temporary deals are left out.

Loading model prices

GPT-5.6 Luna and MiniMax-M3 are both in the ultra-cheap utility tier, designed for high-volume classification, routing, and formatting work where per-token cost dominates. Luna is the cheaper of the two per token. MiniMax-M3 has a context window of up to 1M tokens (512K guaranteed).

Two utility tier models for high volume work. Compare token rates and caching.

Side-by-side specs

SpecGPT-5.6 LunaMiniMax-M3
Input Cost (per M)
$0.20 (better on this spec)
$0.30
Output Cost (per M)
$1.20
$1.20
Cached Input (per M)Cached input is text the provider has already processed. It costs less than fresh input.
$0.02 (better on this spec)
$0.06
Batch input / output (per M)
$0.10 / $0.60
None
Context Window
1.05M
Up to 1M

How they differ

GPT-5.6 Luna is priced at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens at OpenAI's list price, with a 90% caching discount ($0.02 per million), a 50% batch discount and a 1.05M context. MiniMax-M3 is priced at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens, with an 80% caching discount ($0.06 per million) and up to 1M of context.

For a 30K input + 3K output request, Luna costs $0.0096 vs MiniMax's $0.0126, so Luna is cheaper at this volume.

Verdict

Live one-shot loads go to Luna. Luna wins the rows that decide utility pricing: $0.20/M input against $0.30 (33.3% less) and $0.02/M cached input against $0.06 (66.7% less). Output ties at $1.20/M and context is near-tied (1.05M versus up to 1M). The batch row goes to Luna, with batch prices of $0.10/M input and $0.60/M output against MiniMax's none.

Which should you pick?

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna

Maximum-volume utility work: classification, formatting, routing. Luna's $0.20/$1.20 rates make it the cheaper per-token option of the two.

Choose MiniMax-M3

Workloads where MiniMax's reasoning profile specifically outperforms Luna at the task.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.6 Luna or MiniMax-M3 cheaper for utility work?
GPT-5.6 Luna. At $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output it's about 33% cheaper than MiniMax-M3's $0.30 on input and doesn't cost more than its $1.20 on output. A 90% caching discount drops Luna's input to $0.02/M versus MiniMax's 80% discount to $0.06/M.
When does MiniMax-M3 beat GPT-5.6 Luna?
When MiniMax's specific reasoning profile outperforms Luna on the task. For pure live one-shot utility work, Luna wins on price.
What's the context window comparison?
Both share roughly similar context windows: Luna at 1.05M and MiniMax-M3 at up to 1M. Neither has a meaningful capacity advantage.