Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5: API pricing, caching, and inputs

Muse Wonder and Opus 5.5 tie on the half-cached example request. Opus lists batch prices and Wonder doesn't, which matters for overnight work. Wonder accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input.

At standard rates Muse Wonder and Claude Opus 5.5 list the same input and output prices, $4 and $20 per million tokens, so the headline rows can't settle anything. What separates them is cache reads, batch availability and the input types each accepts. Wonder is a reasoning model for complex agentic tasks and is available through its API only. This page prices a long agent session and an overnight batch job on both, then lists what to check before you switch.

Compare cache reads, batch availability, and the input types each model accepts.

By TechCompare · Updated

Meta: Muse Wonder

Meta's own price

Input
$4
Output
$20
Cached
$0.20

per 1M tokens

Price checked 2026-11-07

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic's own price

Input
$4
Output
$20
Cached
$0.20

per 1M tokens

Batch available

Price checked 2026-11-07

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.Prices come live from OpenRouter at each maker's own price where it's listed. Temporary deals are left out.

Side-by-side specs

SpecMuse WonderClaude Opus 5.5
Standard input per 1M tokens
$4.00
$4.00
Standard output per 1M tokens
$20.00
$20.00
Cache reads per 1M tokens
$0.20
$0.20
100K input + 5K output, no cache hits
$0.50
$0.50
100K input + 5K output, half the input cached
$0.31
$0.31
Agent session, 40 turns, mostly cached
$5.88
$5.88
Long prompt rates, input / output per 1M
No separate tier
No separate tier
Batch input / output per 1M
None
$2.00 / $10.00
Input types
Text, image, video, audio, PDF
Check Anthropic's docs
Context window
1,048,576 tokens
1,000,000 tokens
Weights
None published, API only
Closed

How they differ

Muse Wonder charges $4 per million input tokens, $20 per million output tokens and $0.20 for cache reads. Claude Opus 5.5 charges $4, $20 and $0.20. A request with 100,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens costs $0.50 on Wonder and $0.50 on Opus when nothing is cached, or $0.31 and $0.31 with half the input read from cache. Cache reads cost the same on both, so a prefix that gets reused saves the same amount on either side. An agent session of 40 turns, each with 150,000 input tokens, 3,000 output tokens and nearly all of the input cached, costs $5.88 on Wonder and $5.88 on Opus. Opus also bills cache writes, at $5 per million tokens for five minutes and $8 for one hour, and the session figure leaves them out. Batch is the next split. Opus lists batch prices and Wonder doesn't, so a nightly job of 5,000 documents at 20,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens each costs $275 on Opus and $550 on Wonder at standard rates. Opus lists no separate long prompt rate. The embedded calculator uses live OpenRouter rates, which can depend on provider routing.

Verdict

When the rate cards are close, let your own tasks decide. The two cost the same at every cache share, so price can't separate them and accepted results per dollar will. Two practical points follow. Wonder is API only with no published weights, so there's no hosting alternative if its price or terms change. And input types can decide the whole thing, since a pipeline that needs audio or video in one request may not have a clean path on a model that lacks them. Check what each accepts before you price anything.

Which should you pick?

Choose Muse Wonder

Pick Wonder when your agent work includes audio, video or PDF input and you'd rather send the files directly than convert them first. It's a reasoning model aimed at complex agentic tasks, with a 1,048,576 token context. It's available only through its API, and no weights are published, so you can't host it yourself. It lists no batch price right now, so overnight work pays the standard rates. Test it on the tasks where your current model needs the most retries.

Muse Wonder on OpenRouter

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

Pick Opus when your tested tasks finish with fewer errors or less review on it, or when your stack and evaluations already run on Anthropic's API. Its context window is 1,000,000 tokens. It lists batch prices, which lowers the cost of work that can wait for results. Budget for cache writes at $5 per million tokens for five minutes, because a cache that expires gets billed again when it's rebuilt. Confirm its supported input types on Anthropic's pricing and model pages, since this page doesn't list them.

Anthropic's pricing rules

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Wonder the same price as Claude Opus 5.5?
At standard rates, yes. Both list $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens. Cache reads match as well, at $0.20 per million. Equal rates don't mean equal bills, because the two models can use different amounts of reasoning output and tokenize text differently.
How much does a 40 turn agent session cost on each model?
With 150,000 input tokens per turn, nearly all of it cached, and 3,000 output tokens per turn, the session costs $5.88 on Muse Wonder and $5.88 on Claude Opus 5.5. The estimate counts cache reads and leaves out cache writes, tools and retries. Use it to compare the two models, then measure your real hit rate before you trust the total.
Does either model have batch prices?
Opus lists batch prices and Wonder doesn't. A nightly job of 5,000 documents at 20,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens each, with nothing cached, costs $275 on Opus with batch and $550 on Wonder. Batch trades speed for price, so it only suits work that can wait for results.
What input types does Muse Wonder accept?
Muse Wonder accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input, with a 1,048,576 token context. That covers recordings and documents in one request. Media inputs turn into tokens, so measure what your real files produce before you price a pipeline. Check Anthropic's documentation for Opus 5.5's supported inputs, since this page doesn't list them.
Can I host Muse Wonder myself or use another provider?
No weights are published, so it's available through its API only. Check the OpenRouter listing for current routing and prices. Opus is a closed model too, so neither side gives you weights to host.