o4-mini vs GPT-5.4 Mini: reasoning vs standard speed utility costs

Reasoning capabilities versus standard speed-optimized utility.

OpenAI's o4-mini brings native, fast reasoning capabilities to small-scale models. GPT-5.4 Mini focuses on standard rapid instruction following. Deciding between them involves comparing reasoning-compute pricing.

Cost Comparison

Based on 100,000 input tokens (50% cached), 5,000 output tokens, and 100 requests.

o4 Mini
$4.54
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$5.25
GPT-5.4 Mini
$6.38
Claude Haiku 4.5
$8.00
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k)
$17.00
GPT-5.4
$21.25
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$24.00
Claude Opus 4.7
$40.00
GPT-5.5
$42.50
Option A
o4-mini
Wins 2 of 4 compared specs
Option B
GPT-5.4 Mini
Wins 1 of 4 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

Speco4-miniGPT-5.4 Mini
Input Cost (per M)$0.55 (better on this spec)$0.75
Output Cost (per M)$2.20 (better on this spec)$4.50
Cached Input (per M)$0.1375$0.075 (better on this spec)
Batch Discount50%50%

How they differ

o4-mini costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens, with a 75% caching discount. GPT-5.4 Mini is slightly more expensive on standard outputs, costing $0.75 per million input and $4.50 per million output, with a 90% caching discount.

Verdict

o4-mini is highly competitive, offering advanced multi-step reasoning at cheaper standard input/output base rates than GPT-5.4 Mini. Use GPT-5.4 Mini when 90% prompt caching on large repetitive context windows drops its cost lower.

Which should you pick?

Choose o4-mini

Math, coding, and multi-step reasoning tasks on a budget.

Choose GPT-5.4 Mini

Low-latency chat applications with highly static prompt caching.

Related comparisons

GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
The workhorse model pricing showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Frontier reasoning versus optimized price-performance.
Read comparison ➜
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Large 3
Serverless pricing versus flagship open weights.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Fast, lightweight multimodal models comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro (<=200k) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding workhorses and reasoning model showdown.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speedy utility model versus premium reasoning flagship.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4
Utility cost versus premium flagship performance.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
Optimized premium intelligence confrontation.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Rapid response utility models compared.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
Ultra-low-cost utility endpoints comparison.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7
The frontier intelligence showdown.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premium frontier intelligence versus budget-optimized utility.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.5 Pro vs o3 Pro
Pro-tier specialized reasoning comparison.
Read comparison ➜
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premier coding engine versus price-performance champion.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.4 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
High-frequency entry-level endpoints comparison.
Read comparison ➜
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Mistral Codestral
Developer-focused auto-complete and refactoring endpoints.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Low-latency streaming models compared.
Read comparison ➜
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7
Large-context reasoning versus frontier flagship reasoning.
Read comparison ➜
Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Large 3
Utility-scale model versus flagship Europe-hosted logic.
Read comparison ➜
Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Lightweight utility versus balanced medium-scale logic.
Read comparison ➜