TechCompare LogoTechCompare

How much VRAM does GLM-5.3 755B (MoE) need at Q4_K_M? Zhipu's latest 1M flagship

GLM-5.3 755B at Q4_K_M is a ~649 GB resident deployment for 1M context, with 423 GB of it in weights. For most buyers the Z.ai API beats self-hosting until volume hits the hundreds of millions of tokens per month.

GLM-5.3 755B at Q4_K_M with native 1M context needs about 649 GB of VRAM with all experts resident. Z.ai's August 2026 flagship keeps the 753B-scale pool of GLM-5.2 and the same 40B active per-token budget, with the MLA attention stack carried over from 5.2. Those 40B active params don't shrink what has to stay loaded, because different tokens pick different experts.

By TechCompare · Updated

Total VRAM required
649 GB
GLM-5.3 755B (MoE) at Q4_K_M
Weights
423 GB
755B params
KV cache
168 GB
1024K tokens, FP16 KV

Calculator

Estimated VRAM required

649 GB

755B params at Q4_K_M, 1,048,576 token context, batch 1, inference.

Weights
423 GB
KV cache
168 GB
Overhead
59.0 GB

Estimate accuracy: Weights within ~2%. KV cache within ~5% for standard GQA models, ~10% for MLA or hybrid state estimates. Real VRAM may vary with framework (vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Transformers), Flash Attention, and driver overhead.

Hardware that fits

Apple entries show installed unified memory separately from a model budget based on an 8 GB reserve. That budget is a planning heuristic, not a fixed hardware limit.

No single GPU in our catalog has enough memory. Multi-GPU or CPU offload required.

How this is calculated

The 755B pool at Q4_K_M is 423 GB of weights. The MLA key-value cache across 78 layers at a 512-dim latent is 168 GB at the full 1M context. Activation and runtime overhead adds about 59 GB. That makes GLM-5.3 nearly identical to GLM-5.2 on footprint at the same context, since the cache layout is unchanged.

Verdict

The 649 GB resident total is 423 GB of Q4 weights, 168 GB of MLA KV cache at 1M, and 59 GB of overhead. Resident mode needs eight 80 GB cards or five 141 GB H200 cards with NVLink. The 40B active count doesn't lower the resident total, because any token can route to any expert. Capping context to 256K cuts the cache to ~42 GB. Z.ai's official API pricing sits in the mid-tier band, so self-hosting at this scale only wins on data residency or burst-proof capacity.

More GLM scenarios

MiMo-V2.6-Pro at Q4_K_M
Budget a 1.02T expert pool, hybrid attention, and a 1M text context.
View details ➜
MiMo-V2.6-Flash at Q4_K_M
309B total weights and separate global and sliding cache widths.
View details ➜
GLM-5.3-Flash at Q4_K_M
Model the 34 KDA layers, 11 sparse layers, and indexer storage.
View details ➜

Frequently asked questions

How does GLM-5.3 differ from GLM-5.2 on VRAM?
GLM-5.3 is 755B total versus GLM-5.2's 753B, with the same 40B active per token and the same 78-layer MLA attention layout. The resident totals are nearly identical: ~649 GB vs ~648 GB at Q4_K_M and 1M context. The upgrade is quality and long-context reasoning depth, not a footprint change.
Can I run GLM-5.3 on two 80 GB GPUs?
Not with every expert loaded. Two 80 GB cards hold 160 GB, and the 423 GB of Q4 weights alone are well past that. Moving expert weights to system RAM cuts VRAM, but the host then has to hold them and every token gets slower, so measure real memory use before counting on two cards.