What does 165 FPS look like? The next step up from 144 Hz, explained with frame time
By TechCompare · Updated · How we check
165 Hz is worth taking when it costs the same as 144 Hz on a monitor you'd buy anyway. Never pay a premium for the 21 Hz jump. If you're actively choosing between a 165 Hz and 240 Hz panel, go 240 Hz if both fit your budget because it's the first tier above 144 Hz where the smoothness gain is clearly visible. Treat 165 Hz as a 'free upgrade' overlay, not a target tier.
165 FPS next to a 60 FPS reference, both moving at the same speed.
Checking your screen's refresh rate...
At 165 FPS, each frame lasts 6.06 milliseconds. 165 Hz is the in-between monitor tier that sits one notch above 144 Hz and well below 240 Hz, and it exists almost entirely because panel makers started shipping 144 Hz IPS panels that could be safely overclocked to 165 Hz over DisplayPort. The 0.9 ms frame-time drop from 144 FPS is consciously perceptible to maybe half of competitive players and unnoticeable to everyone else.
Recommended monitors
Based on the specs on this page, here are the monitors TechCompare recommends.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Close match - Midrange
Acer Nitro KG241Y Sbiip Monitor
- Diagonal: 23.8″
- Aspect ratio: 16:9
- Resolution: 1920 × 1080
- Refresh Rate: 165 Hz
- Curvature: Flat
- Display type: VA

Close match - Premium
MSI MAG 321UP Monitor
- Diagonal: 31.5″
- Aspect ratio: 16:9
- Resolution: 3840 × 2160
- Refresh Rate: 165 Hz
- Curvature: Flat
- Display type: QD-OLED

Close match - Overkill
LG 45GX950A-B Monitor
- Diagonal: 45″
- Aspect ratio: 21:9
- Resolution: 5120 × 2160
- Refresh Rate: 165 Hz
- Curvature: 800R
- Display type: OLED

Close match - Midrange
Samsung Odyssey G5 C34G55TWWNXZA Monitor
- Diagonal: 34″
- Aspect ratio: 21:9
- Resolution: 3440 × 1440
- Refresh Rate: 165 Hz
- Curvature: 1000R
- Display type: VA

Close match - Overkill
LG 39GX950B-B Monitor
- Diagonal: 39″
- Aspect ratio: 21:9
- Resolution: 5120 × 2160
- Refresh Rate: 165 Hz
- Curvature: 1500R
- Display type: OLED

Close match - Budget
MSI MAG 27C6F Monitor
- Diagonal: 27″
- Aspect ratio: 16:9
- Resolution: 1920 × 1080
- Refresh Rate: 180 Hz
- Curvature: 1500R
- Display type: VA

Close match - Premium
AOC Agon Pro AG346UCD Monitor
- Diagonal: 34″
- Aspect ratio: 21:9
- Resolution: 3440 × 1440
- Refresh Rate: 175 Hz
- Curvature: 1800R
- Display type: QD-OLED

Close match - Budget
MSI MAG 244C Monitor
- Diagonal: 24″
- Aspect ratio: 16:9
- Resolution: 1920 × 1080
- Refresh Rate: 180 Hz
- Curvature: 1500R
- Display type: VA

Close match - Midrange
AOC CQ32G4VE Monitor
- Diagonal: 32″
- Aspect ratio: 16:9
- Resolution: 2560 × 1440
- Refresh Rate: 180 Hz
- Curvature: 1500R
- Display type: VA

Close match - Overkill
Samsung Odyssey G7 G75F Monitor
- Diagonal: 40″
- Aspect ratio: 21:9
- Resolution: 5120 × 2160
- Refresh Rate: 180 Hz
- Curvature: 1000R
- Display type: VA

Close match - Premium
KTC H24T7 Monitor
- Diagonal: 24″
- Aspect ratio: 16:9
- Resolution: 2560 × 1440
- Refresh Rate: 185 Hz
- Curvature: Flat
- Display type: IPS

Close match - Midrange
LG 27GS60QC-B Monitor
- Diagonal: 27″
- Aspect ratio: 16:9
- Resolution: 2560 × 1440
- Refresh Rate: 180 Hz
- Curvature: 1000R
- Display type: VA
Check the model, current price, and availability on Amazon. Amazon may silently display a different product.
How this is calculated
165 Hz monitors became the default '144 Hz upgrade' in the budget gaming tier around 2022-2023 because the panels are physically the same and the overclock is stable, so the manufacturer can market a higher number at almost no cost. Many 144 Hz IPS gaming monitors sold today are actually 165 Hz panels marketed as '144/165 Hz' to cover both listing keywords.
The real visual gain over 144 Hz is small enough that it should never be the deciding factor in a monitor purchase. Prioritize panel quality, resolution, and response time instead. The interesting tier 165 Hz competes with is 240 Hz, where the 1.9 ms frame-time gap to 240 FPS is the first one most players can clearly see in fast motion.
Verdict
Take 165 Hz only when it costs the same as 144 Hz. It's a free upgrade, never a target tier. The 6.06 ms frame budget at 165 FPS is just 0.9 ms shorter than 144 Hz's 6.94 ms, a roughly 15% faster refresh. That's consciously perceptible to maybe half of competitive FPS players in a blind A/B test and unnoticeable to everyone else.
The 1.9 ms cumulative drop from 165 to 240 Hz is the first step where most players can clearly see the smoothness gain in fast motion. A 240 Hz panel earns its premium where a 165 Hz premium doesn't.
More Frame Rate scenarios
Related guides
Frequently asked questions
Is 165 Hz noticeably better than 144 Hz?
Is 165 Hz the same as 144 Hz overclocked?
What's the frame time of 165 FPS?
Does 165 Hz work over DisplayPort and HDMI?
Related tools
Screen Size Visualizer
Compare screen sizes side-by-side to visualize physical dimension differences.
Use toolPPI & Retina Calculator
Calculate PPI and Retina distance for your display.
Use toolDisplay Bandwidth Calculator
Check display bandwidth for HDMI, DisplayPort, USB-C, Thunderbolt, and USB4.
Use toolMemory and Storage Throughput Visualizer
Visualize the large speed gap between CPU cache, RAM, and storage.
Use tool