120Hz vs 144Hz: does the extra 24 Hz matter?

The small step between console high-refresh and the PC gaming standard.

144 Hz refreshes only 1.2× more often than 120 Hz — every 6.94 ms versus 8.33 ms, a difference of just 1.39 ms per frame. This is one of the smallest meaningful steps on the refresh-rate ladder. 120 Hz is the console and TV high-refresh standard; 144 Hz is the long-standing PC gaming monitor default, so the comparison is really about which ecosystem your display targets rather than a dramatic perceptual gap.

Try this comparison with our tools

Live side-by-side at 0.1× speed. Even slowed down, the 120-to-144 difference is subtle — a useful reality check before paying a premium for the extra 24 Hz.

120 FPS / 120 Hz8.33 ms / frame
144 FPS / 144 Hz6.94 ms / frame

Want full controls? Open the FPS Visualizer

Option A
120 Hz
Wins 1 of 8 compared specs
Option B
144 Hz
Wins 4 of 8 compared specs

Side-by-side specs

Spec120 Hz144 Hz
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Frame time8.33 ms6.94 ms (better on this spec)
Frames per second (cap)120 fps144 fps (better on this spec)
Perceived differenceBaselineMarginal (better on this spec)
Input-to-display latency~12-18 ms~10-15 ms (better on this spec)
Typical ecosystemConsoles, TVsPC gaming monitors
GPU load difference1.0×~1.2×
Worth the upgrade alone?- (better on this spec)Not on its own

How they differ

Both rates sit well past the steep part of the perceptual curve, so the 120 → 144 jump is subtle for most people — far less noticeable than 60 → 120. The practical differences are minor: about 1.4 ms less frame time and a sliver less motion blur. The bigger considerations are ecosystem and sync: 120 Hz is friendlier to consoles and HDMI 2.1 TVs, while 144 Hz is the most common native rate on PC gaming monitors and pairs cleanly with DisplayPort. Either way, the GPU cost difference between sustaining 120 and 144 fps is small.

Verdict

Don't agonise over 120 vs 144 — the gap is tiny. Choose based on your platform and panel: 120 Hz if you're console-centric or want HDMI 2.1 TV compatibility, 144 Hz if you're buying a PC gaming monitor where it's the default. Neither will feel meaningfully different in normal use.

Visualise 120 vs 144 FPS motion

Which should you pick?

Choose 120 Hz

Pick 120 Hz when your display is a TV or console-focused panel, or when 120 Hz is the highest your HDMI 2.1 setup cleanly supports at your resolution.

Choose 144 Hz

Pick 144 Hz on PC gaming monitors where it's the native default, you're on DisplayPort, and you want the slightly lower frame time for fast competitive play.

Check DP 1.4 bandwidth for 1440p 144 Hz

Related comparisons

27-inch 1440p vs 32-inch 4K
The gaming sweet spot versus the productivity king.
Read comparison ➜
1080p (1920×1080) vs 1440p (2560×1440)
The most common upgrade path for a mainstream desktop monitor.
Read comparison ➜
1440p (2560×1440) vs 4K (3840×2160)
The GPU-cost trade-off that defines most high-end desktop builds.
Read comparison ➜
4K (3840×2160) vs 8K (7680×4320)
The resolution jump where physics finally outpaces human vision.
Read comparison ➜
30 FPS vs 60 FPS
The most dramatic frame-rate doubling — and the heart of every console performance-mode debate.
Read comparison ➜
60 Hz vs 120 Hz
A clean 2× doubling — the high-refresh tier that current consoles and phones target.
Read comparison ➜
60 Hz vs 144 Hz
The refresh-rate upgrade that most people notice more than a resolution bump.
Read comparison ➜
144 Hz vs 240 Hz
Diminishing returns: where refresh rate upgrades stop being obvious.
Read comparison ➜
165 Hz vs 240 Hz
Where the mainstream high-refresh sweet spot meets the esports tier.
Read comparison ➜
240 Hz vs 360 Hz
Bragging-rights territory: real, measurable, and relevant to almost no one.
Read comparison ➜
Flat vs 1500R
The most common curve on modern gaming monitors and how it compares to a traditional flat panel.
Read comparison ➜
1500R vs 800R
The difference between a mild modern curve and the most aggressive wrap in consumer displays.
Read comparison ➜
Flat vs 800R
The widest gap in consumer monitor geometry: no curve versus the most aggressive one on sale.
Read comparison ➜
Flat vs 1000R
The curvature Samsung markets as matching the natural eye, and how it reads against a traditional flat panel.
Read comparison ➜
1500R vs 1000R
The mild mainstream curve vs the Samsung-popularised "eye-matching" radius.
Read comparison ➜
1000R vs 800R
The immersive but liveable curve vs the full-wrap specialist.
Read comparison ➜
Flat vs 1800R
The mildest curve on sale today vs a traditional flat panel, when the difference barely registers.
Read comparison ➜
1800R vs 1500R
The original mild curvature vs the modern mainstream default, and where the extra 300 mm of tightness shows up.
Read comparison ➜
1800R vs 1000R
The subtlest consumer curve vs the radius Samsung markets as matching the human eye, the first real curvature step.
Read comparison ➜
1800R vs 800R
The gentlest curve you can buy vs the most aggressive, two completely different panels in disguise.
Read comparison ➜
24-inch monitor vs 27-inch monitor
The two diagonals every desk decision starts with.
Read comparison ➜
27-inch monitor vs 32-inch monitor
From the mainstream sweet spot to the desktop centrepiece.
Read comparison ➜
34-inch ultrawide (21:9) vs 27-inch 16:9
The cleanest argument for going ultrawide.
Read comparison ➜
32-inch 16:9 vs 34-inch ultrawide (21:9)
Two big monitors with opposite shapes.
Read comparison ➜
IPS vs VA
Color accuracy versus contrast depth.
Read comparison ➜
OLED vs IPS
Infinite contrast versus color consistency.
Read comparison ➜
TN vs IPS
Raw speed versus visual quality.
Read comparison ➜